Rochester Qjet vs. Holley spreadbore
Forum: C3 HVAC, Fuel, Emissions, and Exhaust
12 Messages
Page 2 of 2
Sponsored Content
F
Former Member
Send PMHouston, TX - USA
Joined: 2/7/2008
Posts: 93
Vette(s): 1970 454 4 speed A/C power everything else
Thanks,
This one is a 650 cfm ,4165 (I think) it has a 6210 part number. Right now I'm having problems with the Qjet.........so I was considering trying the Holley.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
SPONSOR AD:: (Our Sponsors help support Vette Registry)
t
I initially switched my Q-jet out for a Holley 4175 spread bore (vac secondaries). Main reason was that the Q jet needed new primary shaft bushings in addition to the rebuild so I sent it out for work. I had rebuild the holley (took my best guess on the power valve and jets) and retro fitted an electric choke.
Bottom line is that I wish I had never bothered. I got the Q-jet back right away and with a little fine tuning on the jets and primary rods, the part throttle response was far superior to the Holley (even though I think the holley's jet were close). Maybe with some more tuning, the Holley would have worked out better, but the only advantage I could see was that fuel was always at the ready with those big float bowls (car would always start on the first crank of the starter).
Bottom line is that I wish I had never bothered. I got the Q-jet back right away and with a little fine tuning on the jets and primary rods, the part throttle response was far superior to the Holley (even though I think the holley's jet were close). Maybe with some more tuning, the Holley would have worked out better, but the only advantage I could see was that fuel was always at the ready with those big float bowls (car would always start on the first crank of the starter).
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
in Forum: C3 HVAC, Fuel, Emissions, and Exhaust
Sponsored Content