Sponsored Content
j
Thanks for looking out for us!
I thought the design looked awful questionable myself...but I wanted to hear from the folks here!
Jeff
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
SPONSOR AD:: (Our Sponsors help support Vette Registry)
7
I've seen worse and have been under worse. I prefer this now.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
7
Free Member
Send PMYelm, WA - USA
Joined: 7/12/2007
Posts: 356
Vette(s): 1979 L82 4 speed Scat 383 crank 190 cc Procomp Aluminum Heads 202 160 stainless valves GM Powder metal rods Speedpro H860CP Hypereutectic pistons 280 cam hydralic HEI Pro comp 1.6 roller rockers Mighty Demon 750 Sanderson CC1AP Hedders.
I think verticaly your fine with the dead weight, but I would add a second top plate to the ramps. The big concern that I saw is putting a lot of weight and pressure on the ramps that's not static(dead weight). I would shear nail the heck out of the sides, and possibly use mdo instead osb. There would be a lot of horizontal force being applied to walls driving up n down them, and the weight dist of the car sitting static, so I would be more worried about them folding, instead of kicking out.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
in Forum: C3 General Discussion
Sponsored Content