Looking underneath my car, here are two pics of the transmission crossmember:
http://www.VetteRegistry.net/member_uploads/4601_4700/4691/crossmembe r2.jpg
http://www.VetteRegistry.net/member_uploads/4601_4700/4691/crossmembe r1.jpg
My car is a 4-speed, but this looks like a bolt-on crossmember. Am I correct? So along with fibbing about the condition of the engine, has he now also lied about the orginal transmission? The frustration is now starting to set in...
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
I have a '73 that had a TH400 auto tranny and the pictures above look exactly like my old stock crossmember. It bolted just as shown in the pictures (2 bolts underneath and 1 long bolt crossways).
1973 Coupe
(click to see a bigger version)
Sign In to Like this post

Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
I am converting mine to a bolted in cross member to make it easier to install a 5 spd.
its possible but not likely that your guy did the same at some point..
ie converted the cross to make it easier to work on
Sign In to Like this post

Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
[QUOTE=Kiltime] You maybe able to retrieve the vin number off the frame to verify. It is located on top of the frame bythe left rear wheel.[/QUOTE]
thats not going to tell him if the car originally had a MT or AT though..
in theory if your engine VIN matched your body/frame VIN then you could use engine codes to determine the type of trans it had originally. This of course assumes that the transmission VIN doesnt match the car.
Sign In to Like this post