Sign In to Like this post
Ben, I used the l-79 as a comparision, Dry's cam is smaller in all areas accept for max lift which is .003 more, GM reccomends a compression ratio of 9:5- 10:75 for the l-79 cam, he's in the ball park lookin for his seat.....my new 66 SS L-79 Nova came with 3:73gear and the performance gr.'s for 66-67 327 350 hp vette's were also 3:73's, ...what do you suggest he do?
Sign In to Like this post
Ben, I used the l-79 as a comparision, Dry's cam is smaller in all areas accept for max lift which is .003 more, GM reccomends a compression ratio of 9:5- 10:75 for the l-79 cam, he's in the ball park lookin for his seat.....my new 66 SS L-79 Nova came with 3:73gear and the performance gr.'s for 66-67 327 350 hp vette's were also 3:73's, ...what do you suggest he do?
[/QUOTE] i suggest he not expect any low end torque.Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Ben, I used the l-79 as a comparision, Dry's cam is smaller in all areas accept for max lift which is .003 more, GM reccomends a compression ratio of 9:5- 10:75 for the l-79 cam, he's in the ball park lookin for his seat.....my new 66 SS L-79 Nova came with 3:73gear and the performance gr.'s for 66-67 327 350 hp vette's were also 3:73's, ...what do you suggest he do?
[/QUOTE] i suggest he not expect any low end torque.Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post