Sponsored Content
Yep, when I had my rear end rebuilt 7 or 8 years ago the guy at first had trouble locating a 3.36 ring and pinion set. I balked a bit and I'm glad I did because I still think it's the best overall ratio for a cruiser that still has its 1:1 top gear original tranny. The guy ended up finding a 3.36 and I got what I wanted and didn't have to change my speedo drive gear thingy.
1976 Silver/Firethorn. L48, 4spd. Original 2 bolt, vortec heads, 9.4:1 CR, Speed Pro Cam: 224/224@0.050, 112 LSA, Eagle Steel Crank.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
SPONSOR AD:: (Our Sponsors help support Vette Registry)
m
Lifetime Member
Send PMEquinunk, PA - USA
Joined: 10/31/2007
Posts: 2570
Vette(s): 1972 conv, 4-speed, 350, 200hp, numbers match, rally wheels, war bonnett yellow w/white top. good condition, nice driver.
The 3:36 works good for me. Gas is around 18, but hole shot suffers. I am not interested in smokin tires anyway. If your gonna drive any distance the TREMEC 5 cog will take "MANY" hours in the white line lane to have it pay for itself in gas savings. If your gonna spin around town and play with compeditors then go with the 5 speed. I was discouraged from going with a 3:08, and it was a good decision.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
How tough was it to do the removal and install of the rear end?
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Several others have recommended the 3.36 over the 3.08. I am checking that out now. The cat in the picture is no longer with us. He was a great cat!
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Thanks for the advice on the 3.36. I am checking that out with my tech now. I don't think that I want to try to get the rear end out on my own. My tech has done a lot of rear end repairs. He had one on his bench yesterday when I talked to him.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
That LT-1 must have really revved with the 4.11. Can't imagine that being good on the open road, but damn good for dragging.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sounds good to me. I'm getting some price quotes on the 3.36. Don't know about the gear in the trans for the speed-o. Will check that out.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
I will proly go with the 3.36. Thanks for the advice.
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Your 3.64 1st. gear times the new 3.36 rear gear ratio yields a nice total ratio of 12.23.
On the other hand, an old Muncie close ratio with a 2.20 1st gear times an original 3.73 only netted a crappy total 8.21 ratio. I don't believe going to a 3.56 ratio is enough change to be worth the money or effort.
So I like the 3.36 ratio. Your rpm's and torque will drop by 10% and your MPG should increase a little.
John
1973 BB 4-Speed Coupe Project Car
2009 Z06 Mostly Stock
Be the first to like this post
Sign In to Like this post
Sign In to Like this post
in Forum: C3 Engines, Driveline and Handling
Sponsored Content